Matrimony contracts carry out commonly suggest the timeframe when you look at the and that amarriage need to have chosen to take place
step 1. Yet, during the genealogy and family history, each of us knowthat for each and every signal you will find a different. A good vexing part ofgenealogy is the fact not one person very understands how to put on this new exceptions orrules with people decisive adjective such constantly, perhaps, probably,likely, etc. It would be fascinating in the event that here most other instances ofjointures getting generated per year or two immediately following a well-known matrimony time.
2. Could there be an extant dispensation for the relationship off ElizabethClifford and you will Sir Ralph Bowes who were third cousins through Henry Fitzhugh,3rd Lord Fitzhugh or fourth cousins, after taken from the brand new fifth LordClifford? That would narrow down its relationship day.
Arthur
Presumably, in the event that a beneficial dispensation try tried and you will granted, it might havebeen by the one of the following, and might come in the correspondingregister guide, if it endures:
Thomas Savage, Archbishop of York 1501-1507Christopher Bainbridge, Bishop out-of Durham 1507-1508, Archbishop regarding York1508-1514William Senhouse, Bishop away from Durham 1502-1505Thomas Ruthall, Bishop out of Durham 1509-1523Richard Leyburn, Bishop out of Carlisle 1502-1508John Cent, Bishop of Carlisle 1509-1520
5. In the event the tenth Lord Clifford do wed in early 1487 [state January] andhas E later because seasons, does the brand new chronology not performs?
John possession?
E born inside the late 1487, Henry created during hur man gГҐr med en Japanska dam the 1488/nine, Joan from inside the ,etcetera. completing the brands of your upload out-of . In the event that (a) thechronology nevertheless work; and you can (b) their particular wedding section was not low; thenwe have only the fresh 1505 pedigree of Henry VII's that's when you look at the oppositionto the latest supposition that she was a valid child.
6. Concerning your 1505 pedigree: May be the Clifford daughters the brand new onlyknown Henry VII affairs omitted? Were there someone else? In that case,wouldn't you to mirror poorly with this file since the a resource?
Out-of evaluations I've made from the latest c.1505 Henry VII Relations pedigreeswith new 1480-1500 Visitation of your North pedigrees, which happen to be
About c.1505 Affairs pedigrees, this new Clifford children are maybe not listedin a beneficial Clifford pedigree, but instead on St. John pedigree. Because the I'mnot regularly the newest St. John family, after the 's the suggestions asit appears on c.1505 pedigree, since obtained from the fresh new 1834 Coll. Finest. etGen. blog post. The newest phrasing within the quotations is strictly since it seems inthe 1834 article (pp. 310-311).
"Zero. XII."Of my Lord Welles child, Sir Richard Rod, Mistress Verney, SirJohn St. John, with other."f.288, 296, 317, 318."Margaret Duchess off Somerset got about three husbands." Because of the "John Duke ofSomerset" she got "My personal Lady brand new King's Mother." that has "The King." whohad "Prince "By the "Sir Oliver Saint John, earliest husband." she got step 3 daus & 2 sons:
A. "Edith, married so you're able to Geoffrey Pole of Buckinghamshire." They had:A1. "Sir Richard Rod, Knt. married toward Woman Margaret, dau. off theDuke off Clarence." They had: "Harry. "A2. "Alianor, married so you can Ralph Verney, Esq." They had: "John Verney.----- [child, unnamed]. -------[yet another youngster, unnamed]."
B. "John Ssint John, esq." He had five children:B1. "Sir John Saint John, Knight." that has "Four daughters and oneson."B2. "Anne, wedd. in order to Harry Lord Clifford." They had "Jane. Mabill.Henry, young buck and heir. Anne. Thomas. Alianor."B3. "Age, wedded so you're able to Thomas Kent, Esq. out-of Lincolnshire."B4. "A great Nun off Shaftesbury."B5. "Oliver Saint John."
C. "Dame Mary, married to Sir Richard Frognall." They had:C1. "Edmond Frognall and his brethren and you can sistren." That have issueindicated, not named.C2. "Age, married so you're able to Sir William Gascoigne, Knt."
D. "E, wedded basic to the Lord Zouche; immediately following for the LordScrope out of Bolton." Issue:D1. [by the Zouche] " Catesby." They had:"Age. George. John. William."D2. [by Scrope] " Conyers." Having issueindicated however named.
Margaret Duchess out of Somerset, by "Lionel Lord Welles, last husband."had: "John Viscount Welles, wedded Cecily, dau. off K. Edward IV." andthey got "E."